Monday, June 10, 2013

Capital Allocators

I’m about to talk about one of my favorite types of companies, so first I must confess that I own several of them including Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), Leucadia National (LUK), Redwood Trust (RWT), Markel Corp (MKL), White Mountains (WTM), Seacor Holdings (CKH), and Loews (L).  I have owned Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) in the past and I have Alleghany Corp, (Y) and Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) on my wish list. 

As some of you may have realized from my disclosure above one of my favorite types of companies is what is sometimes referred to as a “capital allocator”.  These companies focus on generating strong returns through allocating their capital wisely.  The most well-known capital allocation company is Berkshire Hathaway which is managed by legendary investor Warren Buffett as well as Charlie Munger.  Other popular companies include Loews and Leucadia National.  Capital allocation decisions involve whether to grow organically by plowing money into current businesses, purchasing new companies, selling businesses or business units, paying dividends, buying back stock, and I would also include financing decisions.  I love these types of companies because a good capital allocator is a great investment to own over 5, 10, or 20+ years as they are constantly looking to add value for shareholders.  Also, they are somewhat like a focused mutual fund only without the annual expenses.  Most good capital allocators look to grow organically, but they do so in an intelligent and disciplined manger.  Most projects they undertake should create strong returns using conservative estimates.  These companies will do M&A transactions, but are very selective and pay a lot of attention to valuation and industry fundamentals.  There are quite a few capital allocators that also focus on buying back shares; however, they do so differently than your typical company.  Most companies that buy back shares do not pay enough attention to valuation and often over pay.  Capital allocators only buy back their shares if they feel that they are undervalued using conservative estimates.  The biggest waste of capital is to buy back shares when they are trading at a premium to the actual value of the company, but on the other hand buying back shares at a discount to intrinsic value is highly beneficial to shareholders over the long-term.  Some capital allocators do pay regular dividends, while others only pay them when they cannot find enough organic growth, M&A deals are being over priced, and the stock is trading at too high of value.  Dividend payments create taxes for shareholder so it is more efficient to use capital in other ways if possible.  However, some companies do use dividend payments as a way to force capital discipline which is a laudable goal. 

Many capital allocation companies are diversified holding companies, such as Berkshire, Leucadia, and Loews.  However, a company does not have to be a diversified holding company to be a strong capital allocator.  Redwood Trust, for example, is in a niche business although they do have more than one source of value generation.  Capital allocation companies also have a tendency to own large financial services business.  For example Berkshire Hathaway owns several large insurance companies and Loews also owns a large insurance company.  Leucadia National just purchased an investment bank and has owned insurance companies in the past.  Markel, White Mountains, Alleghany Corp, and Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd are primarily insurance companies, although some of them do have non-insurance business such as Markel with their Markel Ventures businesses.  Redwood Trust is a unique mortgage REIT and Brookfield Asset Management is a physical real estate firm.  So, trying to build out a diversified portfolio can be difficult as you may end up with a large allocation to the financial sector.  There are capital allocators out there that do not have financial businesses, such as Seacor Holdings which owns shipping services (inland marine, offshore service vessels, oil tankers) and a few other businesses.  I have also had people argue that Canadian Natural Resources is a good capital allocator in the energy sector. 

Just like any other company, however, they can become overvalued so you still have to pay attention to the price you pay for them.  That being said if you can buy one at a fair valuation you should be able to generate strong future returns.  If you can get your hands on a capital allocator at a cheap valuation then allocate a lot of capital to it.  Also, just because a company says they are a good capital allocator doesn’t mean you should trust them.  I have found several companies that were supposed to be the next “Berkshire” but after digging into them there is no way I would invest in them.  Make sure to verify that potential capital allocators are growing book value/share and cash flow at above average rates.  If you are interested in a more detailed look at many capital allocators you should vies the Brooklyn Investor Blog (http://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/).  The author does a superb job on just about every post and he mostly covers capital allocation companies.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment